Core truth filtering system

Aletheia Layer,where raw signals are forced to earn attention.

Aletheia sits between noisy crypto input and the product's visible queues. It only forwards items that produce a real action, rejects commentary and stale chatter, assigns urgency based on consequence, and adjusts rank as the time window tightens.

Valid Action Rules

Aletheia should only surface items that resolve into an executable next step.

an item names a concrete step with a verb and object the user can act on now

Then

treat it as a valid action candidate.

an item includes a real trigger or changed condition with a source that can be checked

Then

keep it eligible for surfacing.

the user can complete, snooze, or ignore the item without extra interpretation

Then

keep it in the action pipeline.

the item has a defined consequence for acting or not acting

Then

score it for urgency and ranking.

the item is only a topic, thesis, or market observation with no next step

Then

reject it as not action-ready.

Noise Filter Rules

Anything that increases attention cost without changing behavior should be discarded.

an item is commentary, sentiment, hype, or broad market narration without a required decision

Then

filter it out as noise.

an item is a duplicate of an action already surfaced with no new consequence

Then

merge or discard it.

an item depends on rumor, anonymous claims, or unverifiable screenshots

Then

filter it out until verified.

an item describes price movement alone without changing what the user should do

Then

filter it out as price gawking.

the triggering event is already resolved, expired, or too stale to change behavior

Then

remove it from ranking.

Urgency Assignment Rules

Urgency reflects consequence, not excitement.

inaction before the next review cycle can cause loss, lockout, security exposure, forced execution, or a missed hard deadline

Then

assign High urgency.

acting today materially improves outcome, but delay does not create immediate irreversible damage

Then

assign Medium urgency.

the item is useful but delay has little cost and the window remains open after today

Then

assign Low urgency.

an item lacks enough evidence to determine consequence

Then

do not assign urgency yet; keep it suppressed or under review.

new evidence increases downside or shortens the action window

Then

raise urgency by one band.

Time Sensitivity Ranking Rules

Time sensitivity changes position in the queue as the action window closes.

two actions share the same urgency and one expires sooner

Then

rank the earlier deadline first.

an action will expire before the user's next normal review window

Then

promote it toward the top of its urgency band.

time remaining shrinks while urgency stays constant

Then

increase rank progressively as the deadline approaches.

an action has no clear deadline or remains valid for days without penalty

Then

rank it below time-bound items in the same urgency band.

the deadline passes and the action no longer has value

Then

drop it from the surfaced queue.